-J-

The journalist - the person actively communicating with a considerable quantity of other people in the field of intellectual mass activity (a mass culture, gathering, processing, distribution of socially significant information) and having, unlike others, possibility regularly and practically free to state the sights, imposing to their unsophisticated readers. In this connection to moral qualities of journalists increased requirements, however, as well as teachers, doctors, and also statesmen are shown.

Last decades from representatives of many trades exclamations "We too people began to be distributed, we too wish to take bribes for the work, anything human is not alien to us", - erosion of the basic part of a society has begun, that naturally conducts to the accelerated disintegration of the nation and its subsequent destruction.

On J.Bohenskomu [7]: "... The journalist is a reviewer, and more anybody. It is the expert in gathering, a statement and an information transfer. And while he is engaged in it, its work is useful and to reproach him there is nothing. However for last hundred years journalists have appropriated other function and act now in a role of teachers, preachers of morals. They not simply inform readers and listeners that has occurred. As it seems to them, they have the right to teach, that should think and do. And as sights of journalists have mass distribution, they appear in exclusive position, getting the present monopoly for the decision of questions on good and harm.

Belief in that and should be, that the journalist has the right to behave in such a manner that it is necessary to listen to its manuals, - one of typical errors of today. The journalist does not possess any authority that us to teach. As that, it is not neither the expert in any science, nor moral authority, the political leader. He is able to observe, write down and speak only ".

It is felt, that journalists "have fine worn out" J.Bohenskogo, though in many respects it and the rights. But its representations, that "political leaders, moral authorities, or experts in any science" have more than the rights, than journalists, too superstition.

Just what isn't needed reception of demagogy and one of errors of the intuitive thinking, consisting that the person easily accepts the answer which is full contrast to the correct for true; the mechanism just what isn't needed well works when the problem is too difficult for the fast full logic analysis. To it on sense pseudo-correct decisions are close enough.

The decision just what isn't needed allows to choose from set of decisions only two, that is sharply simplifies a problem for carrying out of the further analysis.